![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EminTech |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
+ reproducible results + stable calibration + quick measurements + nice design |
- fan sound - nonofficial calibration samples - nondocumented calibration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software AquaLab 3 delivered very accurate results. The instrument was not, however, possible to adjust to give even better results. Optimisation of results were possible using continuous measurements in AquaLab and storing results in a connected PC. Each time a measurement was finished, AquaLab wrote aw and temperature to its RS232 port. The aw values were given four digits, one more than shown by the instrument's display. The data from the instrument could be read directly by any RS232 software. The Decagon software "AquaLink v. 3.0" |
Sensor technology The instrument monitors condensation of water on a chilled mirror. The temperature difference, between sample and mirror when condensation occurs, is calculated into water activity. The sensor technology appears to be superior to other types of sensors, provided the sample do not contain volatile solvents like propylene glycol, that will interfere with water during measurements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Handling |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design The design was simple and very appealing. "Less is more" is apparently the designer's motto. A surprising minor flaw in the design was that the RS232 cable could not be securely tightened to the instrument. Another flaw in the design was the sound from the cooling fan. It should be more silent in a quality instrument like this. Temperature instability The analysis temperature could be set in AquaLab 3TE as opposed to the model AquaLab 3. The temperature appeared not to be stable, however, and drifted towards room temperature during analysis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manual The manual was informative and easy to read. It was translated into Swedish by the Swedish agent. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Calibration Tests on Decagon calibration samples gave excellent results, and calibration was apparently not needed for the instrument. According to the manual, adjustment of linear offset, but not of slope, is possible and is easily performed. Offset adjustment is needed when the sensor mirror becomes contaminated. Slope adjustments are done by Decagon representatives, but are said to be rarely needed . Calibration samples For adjustment of linear offset and for validation, Decagon manufactures ampoules containing calibration liquid, guaranteed by Decagon to show correct values. Other calibration samples may be used. Unfortunately, publications that document the absolute reliability of the ampoules have not been found. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Sample cups Sample cup volume: 11 ml. Sample height: 10 mm. Sample cups for Decagon AquaLab and Novasina LabMASTER were almost identical. Instruction video A CD containing manuals and a very instructive video, showing how to clean the measurement cell, should it be contaminated, was included with the instrument. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Measurement results The results are discussed in Summary - Desktop instruments The instrument was used as delivered, i.e. was not calibrated. DecCal1 The results from the Decagon calibration samples, DecCal1, were excellent. SatSalt2 and SatSalt3 The salt slurries SatSalt2 and SatSalt3, analysed 11 days later, gave almost identical results. The results were deviating slightly from literature values. When the salt slurries were analysed at 25 °C (not shown), the results were about identical as obtained at 22.5°C . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measurements and ending criteria
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deviation versus aw for AquaLab 3TE. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Test of HygroLab 2 | aw instrument test introduction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Test of LabMASTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||